Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SMITA RATAN CHINOY AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

A writ petition was filed on 20 December 2019 by Smita Ratan Chinoy and another petitioner seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioners failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after filing. The court noted that the petitioners appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. The dismissal was recorded by both judges on 31 July 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioners' failure to appear and pursue the case

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • high court
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                 DTG                                                                   82-Wp-198-2020.doc



                                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                               CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                 WRIT PETITION NO. 198 OF 2020

                 Smita Ratan Chinoy & Anr.                                           … Petitioners
                                 V/s.
                 The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                                     … Respondents
                                            _______________________________________

                 None for Petitioners.

                 Smt. P.P. Shinde, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
                                   _______________________________________

                                                     CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                             KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                     DATE  : 31st July 2026

                 P.C. :

                 1)                     None for the Petitioners when called out for hearing.

                 2)                     Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

                 20th December 2019, neither the Petitioners nor their Advocate have taken

                 any steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

                 2.1)                   It appears that, the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing the

                 Petition.

                 3)                     Dismissed for non-prosecution.




                                        ( KAMAL KHATA, J. )                    ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
              Digitally signed
              by
DNYANESHWAR   DNYANESHWAR
TULSHIRAM     TULSHIRAM
GHUMNAR       GHUMNAR
              Date: 2026.08.06
              19:03:44 +0530
                                                                                                            1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.