Bombay High Court
GORAKH HIRAMAN JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS DISTRICT COLLECTOR NASHIK AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear.
Summary
Gorakh Hiraman Jadhav filed Civil Writ Petition No. 1994 of 2026 in the High Court of Bombay challenging the actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear when called for hearing. The respondents were represented by Smt. Neha Bhide and Smt. Leena Patil. The Court noted the petitioner's non‑appearance and lack of prosecution of the petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for non‑prosecution.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when a petitioner fails to appear for a scheduled hearing in a civil writ petition?
Subjects
- writ petition
- non-prosecution
- civil procedure
- court dismissal
Judgment
DTG 37-Wp-1994-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 1994 OF 2026
Gorakh Hiraman Jadhav … Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
_______________________________________
None for Petitioner.
Smt. Neha Bhide, G.P. a/w Smt. Leena Patil, ‘B’, Panel for Respondent-State.
_______________________________________
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 17th June 2026
P.C. :
1) None for Petitioner when called out for hearing.
2) Dismissed for non-prosecution.
( KAMAL KHATA, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
1/1
Checking your session…