Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SAFIQUE AHMED ASHIK ALI SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear or take steps to pursue the petition.

Summary

The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for hearing after August 26, 2016 and did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief sought. Consequently, the court considered whether the petition could continue despite the lack of prosecution. Relying on the principle that a petition must be actively pursued, the court held that the failure to appear and act constitutes non‑prosecution. The petition was therefore dismissed. No substantive merits of the petition were examined.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear and take steps to pursue it

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • high court
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

          ssm                                                        24-wp2015.2015.doc

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                  CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                   WRIT PETITION NO. 2015 OF 2015

     Safique Ahmed Ashik Ali Shaikh                                  …..Petitioner

               Vs.

     The State Of Maharashtra & Ors.                                 …..Respondents

                                 ____________________________________

     None for the Petitioner.
     Smt. Ranjana D. Humane APP, for the Respondent-State.
                       ____________________________________

                                             CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                          KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                               DATE :     4th MARCH, 2026.

     P.C.:-

     1)                  None for Petitioner when called out for hearing.

     2)                  Record indicates that, after 26 th August, 2016, Petitioner

     and/or his Advocate has not taken any steps to circulate the Petition, even

     for once.

     2.1)                It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

     Petition.

     3)                  Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                 (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                            (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

              Digitally signed
              by SANJIV
SANJIV    SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR
MASHALKAR Date:                                                                           1/1
              2026.03.06
              18:50:56 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.