Bombay High Court
SACHIN VILAS KADAM AND ANR POA HOLDER DASHARATH DHONDIBA JADHAVversusTHE DISTRICT COLLECTOR SATARA
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Sachin Vikas Kadam and another, represented by power of attorney holder Dasharath Dhondiba Jadhav, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, challenging an order of the District Collector, Satara. The petition was heard by a two‑judge bench comprising Justices Milind N. Jadhav and Nandesh S. Deshpande. The Court noted that the petition had not been pursued further after its filing. Consequently, the Court applied the procedural rule of dismissal for want of prosecution. The order dated 9 July 2026 was affirmed, resulting in the dismissal of the writ petition. No substantive merits of the dispute were addressed as the case was terminated on procedural grounds.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution?
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- procedural default
- High Court
- civil appellate jurisdiction
Judgment
10-wp2033.26.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No.2033 OF 2026
Sachin Vikas Kadam and another, power of attorney holder
Dasharath Dhondiba Jadhav
VERSUS
The District Collector, Satara
…
None for petitioner
Mr. V.M. Mali, AGP for respondent/State
...
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, &
NANDESH S. DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATE : 31st JULY 2026.
P. C. :
In view of the order dated 9th July, 2026, the writ petition
stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
[NANDESH S. DESHPANDE, J.] [MILIND N. JADHAV, J.]
Wadode.
1 of 1
Checking your session…