Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SUDHIR POPATLAL KOTAKversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Allowed To be withdrawn

Holding

The writ petition was withdrawn with liberty to file a Section 173(8) application, and the criminal application did not survive the disposal.

Summary

The petitioner, Sudhir Popatlal Kotak, filed a writ petition after the police had already filed a charge‑sheet. He sought leave to withdraw the petition and instead file an application under Section 173(8) of the Criminal Procedure Code for further investigation. The Court granted the leave, allowing the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition and to pursue the Section 173(8) application before the trial court. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn. Since the writ petition was disposed, the accompanying criminal application (No. 303 of 2017) was also deemed not to survive and was disposed of. The order was pronounced by Justices A.S. Gadkari and Kamal Khata.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw the writ petition and seek relief under Section 173(8) of the CrPC
  • Effect of the disposal of the writ petition on the pending criminal application No. 303 of 2017

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • Section 173(8)
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • charge-sheet
  • High Court

Judgment

                   KSG                                                         43-WP-2053-2017.doc



                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                         CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                           WRIT PETITION NO. 2053 OF 2017

                   Sudhir Popatlal Kotak                                     … Petitioner
                            V/s.
                   The State Of Maharashtra & Ors                            … Respondents
                                                      WITH
                                       CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.303 OF 2017
                                                           IN
                                           WRIT PETITION NO. 2053 OF 2017
                   Gold Plaza Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Ors                     … Interveners
                   In the matter between :
                   Sudhir Popatlal Kotak                                     … Petitioner
                            V/s.
                   The State Of Maharashtra & Ors                            … Respondents
                                      _______________________________________
       Digitally
       signed by
       KIRAN
KIRAN SANJAY
SANJAY GHUGE
GHUGE 2026.04.23
       Date:       Mr. Kunal Ambolkar, for the Petitioner.
       15:47:49
       +0530
                   Mr. J.P. Yagnik, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1-State.
                                     _______________________________________

                                               CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                       KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                               DATE  : 18th APRIL 2026

                   P.C. :

                   1)              As the police have already filed charge-sheet, learned Advocate

                   for the Petitioner, on instructions seeks leave to withdraw Petition with

                   liberty to file an Application under Section 173(8) of Criminal Procedure

                   Code, 1973, before the trial Court to seek relief of further investigation.

                                                                                                     1/2
KSG                                                         43-WP-2053-2017.doc



1.1)        Leave and liberty granted.

2)          Disposed off as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.

3)          In view of disposal of Writ Petition, Criminal Application No.303

of 2017, does not survive and is also disposed off.




            ( KAMAL KHATA, J. )                       ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )




                                                                                  2/2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.