Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

TARABEN NAVINBHAI BAROTversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear or take steps to advance the petition.

Summary

The petitioner, Taraben Navinbhai Barot, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, made no effort to circulate the petition after September 24, 2018. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief sought. Consequently, the judges noted the lack of prosecution of the petition. The petition was therefore dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear and pursue the case?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • court procedure

Judgment

                         sbw                                                   291-wp-2054-2018.doc

                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                          CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                            WRIT PETITION NO.2054 OF 2018

                    Taraben Navinbhai Barot                               … Petitioner

                             V/s.

                    The State of Maharashtra & Anr.                       … Respondents




                    None for the Petitioner.
                    Smt. Mankuwar M. Deshmukh, Acting P.P., for the Respondent-State.


                                                       CORAM :       A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                     KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                         DATE :      18th April 2026

                    P.C.:-

                    1)              None for Petitioner when called out for hearing.

                    2)              Record indicates that, after 24th September, 2018, Petitioner

                    and/or her Advocate has not taken any steps to circulate the Petition, even

                    for once.

                    2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

                    Petition.

                    3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                     (A.S. GADKARI, J.)


       Digitally
       signed by
       SANDHYA
                                                                                                      1/1
SANDHYA BHAGU
BHAGU   WADHWA
WADHWA Date:
       2026.04.23
       12:02:09
       +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.