Bombay High Court
SAMTA NAGARI SAHAKARI PATSANSTHA MARYADIT KOPARGAON THROUGH ITS GENERAL MANAGER SACHIN S BHATTADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petitioner had complied with the notice, and therefore the petition was dismissed.
Summary
The petitioner, Samta Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit Kopargaon, filed writ petition No. 28 of 2016 challenging the State of Maharashtra. The petition arose from a notice dated 8 December 2015 requiring the petitioner to submit the audit report for the year 2014 to the Special Auditor, Class‑II. The petitioner filed a reply indicating that the audit report had been submitted to the Special Auditor. The Court examined the reply and found that the petitioner had complied with the statutory requirement. Consequently, the Court held that no grounds remained for the relief sought and the petition was disposed of.
Issues considered
- Did the petitioner comply with the notice to submit the 2014 audit report to the Special Auditor, Class‑II?
Subjects
- audit compliance
- writ petition
- cooperative society
- special auditor
- disposal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:11994
Dilwale 1 28-wp- 2065-16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
28 WRIT PETITION NO. 2065 OF 2016
Samta Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit Kopargaon Through Its
General Manager Sachin S Bhattad
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
...
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Bhavar Nitin R
AGP for Respondents: Mrs. D. S. Jape
...
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
DATE : 18.03.2026
PER COURT :
1. Pursuant to notice dated 8th December, 2015, the petitioner has
submitted a reply which is at page No.21, pointing out that the audit
report for the year 2014 has been submitted to the Special Auditor, Class-
II.
2. In view of the above, it appears that the petitioner has already
complied with the said notice. Therefore, nothing survives in the present
petition and the same stands disposed of accordingly.
[ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ]
JUDGE
Checking your session…