Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

N. DEVADASANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner filed a writ petition on 6 May 2015 in the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for non‑prosecution. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed on the ground of non‑prosecution

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • high court
  • procedural default

Judgment

                ssm                                                         28-wp2092.2015.doc

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                    CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                      WRIT PETITION NO. 2092 OF 2015

          N. Devadasan                                                …..Petitioner

                    Vs.

          The State Of Maharashtra & Ors.                             …..Respondents

                                   ____________________________________

          None for the Petitioner.
          Mr. Ajay Patil APP, for the Respondent-State.
                            ____________________________________

                                                  CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                               KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                    DATE :     4th MARCH, 2026.

          P.C.:-

          1)                  None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

          2)                  Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

          6th May, 2015, the Petitioner and/or his Advocate has not taken any steps to

          circulate the Petition, even for once.

          2.1)                It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

          Petition.

          3)                  Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                      (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                              (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

           Digitally signed
           by SANJIV
SANJIV    SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR
MASHALKAR Date:
           2026.03.06
           18:51:32 +0530                                                                        1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.