Bombay High Court
PRAFULLA MAHADEV MAHANGARE AND ORS.versusCOLLECTOR OF STAMPS PUNE RURAL AND ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed off as Withdrawn
Holding
The petition was dismissed as infructuous because the petitioners had already paid the deficit stamp duty.
Summary
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the demand for deficit stamp duty. They subsequently paid the outstanding stamp duty, rendering the subject matter of the petition moot. The petitioners argued that there was nothing left for the court to consider. The court accepted that the petition had become infructuous after the payment. Consequently, the court disposed of the petition as infructuous without further adjudication.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition remains maintainable after the petitioners have paid the deficit stamp duty.
Subjects
- stamp duty
- writ petition
- infructuous
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- High Court of Bombay
Judgment
3. WP 2199-2018.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2119 OF 2018
Prafulla Mahadev Mahangare & Ors. … Petitioners
V/s.
Collector of Stamps,
Pune Rural, Pune & Ors. … Respondents
------
Mr. Anish Khandekar for the Petitioners.
Ms. Tanu Bhatia, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 to 3.
------
CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL &
SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 2nd FEBRUARY 2026
P.C.
1) Learned Counsel for the Petitioners states that the Petitioners have
already paid deficit stamp duty and as such nothing survives for further
consideration. The Petition has become infructuous. Statement is
recorded and accepted. The Petition is disposed of as having rendered
infructuous.
(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
RvC 1/1
RAJESH Digitally signed by
RAJESH VASANT
VASANT CHITTEWAN
Date: 2026.02.03
CHITTEWAN 18:09:55 +0530
Checking your session…