Bombay High Court
VILAS SURAYAKANT MAYEKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 12 April 2019 in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court noted the petitioner's apparent lack of interest in pursuing the matter. On this basis, the court held that the petition could not be proceeded with. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution. No substantive merits of the petition were examined.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner does not appear and fails to circulate the petition
Subjects
- writ petition
- non‑prosecution
- dismissal
- petitioner non‑appearance
- Bombay High Court
Judgment
DTG 218-Wp.2136.2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2136 OF 2019
Vilas Surayakant Mayekar … Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
_______________________________________
Petitioner in person is not present.
Mr. J.P. Yagnik, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
_______________________________________
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 17th June 2026
P.C. :
1) Petitioner in person is not present when called out for hearing.
2) Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.
12th April 2019, the Petitioner has not taken any steps to circulate the
Petition, even once.
2.1) It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the
Petition.
3) Dismissed for non-prosecution.
( KAMAL KHATA, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
1/1
Checking your session…