Bombay High Court
GOLDIE SUDversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The Court quashed the FIR and the charge‑sheet, holding that the settlement and consent of the complainant justify dismissal of the criminal proceedings.
Summary
The petitioners, including Rajesh Dwarkadas Tulsiani, were named as accused in FIR C.R. No. 499 of 2020 for alleged offences under Sections 342, 347, 427, 504, 506, 201 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, arising from a family property dispute. The complainant, Respondent No.2, who is the petitioner’s brother, alleged illegal entry, intimidation and abuse. The parties subsequently reached an amicable settlement and the complainant filed a consent affidavit seeking quash of the criminal proceedings. The Bombay High Court examined whether a settlement and the complainant’s consent justify quashing the FIR and the charge‑sheet. Finding that the dispute was resolved and continuation of the case would serve no purpose, the Court allowed the writ petition and ordered the FIR and charge‑sheet to be quashed. The related interim application was also disposed, and other pending writ petitions were listed for further directions.
Issues considered
- Whether an FIR and charge‑sheet can be quashed on the ground of an amicable settlement and the complainant's consent.
Legislation cited
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 201, 34, 342, 347, 427, 504, 506
Subjects
- quash
- FIR
- charge sheet
- amicable settlement
- family property dispute
- consent affidavit
- Indian Penal Code
- Bombay High Court
- criminal procedure
Judgment
(58)-WP-393-23 & group matters.doc.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Digitally
signed by
BALAJI
GOVINDRAO
WRIT PETITION NO.393 OF 2023
BALAJI
GOVINDRAO PANCHAL
PANCHAL Date:
2023.07.13
16:39:27
+0530
Rajesh Dwarkadas Tulsiani …Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra and Anr. …Respondents.
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.337 OF 2023
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.393 OF 2023
Goldie Sud …Applicant
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Rajesh Dwarkadas Tulsiani …Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra and Anr. …Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.2029 OF 2021
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1860 OF 2021
AND
WRIT PETITION NO. 2184 OF 2021
Goldie Sud ...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents
Mr. Samruddhi Bendbhor i/by Parinam Law Associates, for the
Petitioner in WP/393/2023.
Mr. K. V. Saste, APP for the Respondent-State.
BGP. 1 of 4
(58)-WP-393-23 & group matters.doc.
Mr. Sandeep Kekane, for the Respondent No.2.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE &
SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE : June 15, 2023.
ORDER (Per : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.):
1. Heard.
2. The Petitioners in Writ Petition NO. 393 of 2023 and
Writ Petition No. 2184 of 2021 have been arrayed as accused in First
Information Report (FIR) being C.R.No.499 of 2020, registered with
L.T. Marg Police Station, Mumbai for the alleged offence punishable
under Sections 342, 347, 427, 504, 506, 201 read with 34 of the
Indian Penal Code, 1860 in which the petitioner is charge-sheeted.
The quashing is sought on the premise that that the dispute has
been settled between the parties.
3. The FIR in question came to be lodged by the
Respondent No.2 against the Petitioner in Writ Petition No.393 of
2023, who is his brother and against his friend on the allegation
that the Petitioner illegally entered the Respondent no.2-
BGP. 2 of 4
(58)-WP-393-23 & group matters.doc.
complainant’s property and abused and intimidated the Respondent
no.2-Complainant. The dispute appears to be in respect of certain
family properties.
4. The consent-affidavit of the Respondent No.2 was
tendered before this Court on 21st November, 2022, in which the
consent is extended for quashing of the petitions.
5. Considering the relations between the parties, the nature
of dispute and the fact that the parties have amicably settled the
dispute and entered into compromise, we see no reason to continue
with the criminal proceedings, as the same would not achieve any
fruitful outcome. The consent affidavit filed by the Respondent
No.2-Complainant extends the consent for quashing of the subject
FIR, and as such, we see no impediment to allow the writ petition.
7. The Writ Petition No.393 of 2023 stands allowed and the
FIR being C.R.No.499 of 2022, registered with L.T. Marg Police
Station, Mumbai, against the Petitioner - Rajesh Dwarkadas Tulsaini,
so also, consequential charge-sheet is hereby quashed and set aside.
8. In view of disposal of Writ Petition No.393 of 2023,
BGP. 3 of 4
(58)-WP-393-23 & group matters.doc.
Interim Application No.337 of 2023 also stands disposed of.
9. Writ Petition No.2029 of 2021 along with Interim
Application No.1860 of 2021 and Writ Petition No.2184 of 2021 be
listed for direction on 10th July, 2023.
[SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.] [NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]
BGP. 4 of 4
Checking your session…