Bombay High Court
M/S.NARMADA ESTATES PVT.LTD.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA and ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed off as Withdrawn
Holding
The petition is disposed of as withdrawn upon the petitioner's instruction.
Summary
The petitioner, Narmada Estates Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner later instructed its counsel, Mr. Rohan P. Surve, to withdraw the petition, stating it had become infructuous. The written instruction was tendered and marked for identification. The Court accepted the withdrawal and ordered the petition to be disposed of as withdrawn. All pending applications, if any, were also disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn by the petitioner upon its own request
Subjects
- withdrawal
- writ petition
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- Bombay High Court
Judgment
903_WP_2206_04.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2206 OF 2004
Narmada Estates Pvt. Ltd. … Petitioner
vs.
The State of Maharashtra and others … Respondents
Mr. Rohan P. Surve for petitioner.
Mr. B. V. Samant, Addl. GP a/w. Ms. M. S. Bane, AGP for respondent-State.
CORAM : MANISH PITALE &
SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ
DATE : 12th JUNE, 2026
P.C. :
. The learned counsel for the petitioner has received written
instructions from the petitioner to withdraw the present petition,
stating that it has become infructuous.
2. Copy of the written instructions is tendered. The same is taken
on record and marked ‘X’ for identification.
3. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of as
withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.) (MANISH PITALE, J.)
Priya Kambli
Digitally
signed by
PRIYA PRIYA KAMBLI
Date:
KAMBLI 2026.06.12
18:08:29
+0530
1/1
Checking your session…