Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PATBANDHARE KARMACHARI SAHAKARI PATSANSTHA MARYADIT PARBHANI THROUGH ITS CHAIRMANversusRAJESHWAR DIGAMBARRAO SANLAPURKAR AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court held that the appearance of counsel for respondent No.1 was shown in the order, so the motion for speaking to the minutes was disposed of.

Summary

Patbandhare Karmachari Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit filed writ petitions (Nos. 2210 and 2209 of 2020) challenging the appearance of counsel for respondent No.1 in an order dated 30 April 2026. Respondent No.1, through counsel Mr. S.V. Kulkarni, moved a motion seeking clarification (speaking to the minutes) that his appearance had not been recorded. The Court examined the order and found that the appearance of Mr. Kulkarni was indeed shown. Accordingly, the Court held that there was no omission requiring correction. The motion for speaking to the minutes was therefore disposed of. No substantive merits of the writ petitions were addressed in this order.

Issues considered

  • Whether the appearance of counsel for respondent No.1 was shown in the order dated 30 April 2026

Subjects

  • procedural order
  • minutes of order
  • appearance of counsel
  • writ petition
  • court procedure

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:20875                                                           Writ Petition No.2210/2020
                 This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //
                                                        :: 1 ::


                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                                         BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                   WRIT PETITION NO.2210 OF 2020

            Patbandhare Karmachari Sahakari
            Patsanstha Maryadit, Parbhani                                    ….Petitioner
                     VERSUS
            Rajeshwar Digambarrao Sanlapurkar & ors.                         ….Respondents
                                             .......
            Mr. S.J. Salunke, Advocate for petitioner
            Mr. S.V. Kulkarni, Advocate for R.No.1.
            Mr. V.V. Ghansawdh, Advocate holding for
            Mr. M.V. Thorat, Advocate for R.No.3, 6, 7 & 9
            Mr. S.S. Halkude, Advocate for R.No.5
            Mr. A.R. Rathod, Advocate for R.No.10
                                             ....…
                                                        WITH
                                  WRIT PETITION NO.2209 OF 2020
            Patbandhare Karmachari Sahakari
            Patsanstha Maryadit, Parbhani                                    ….Petitioner
                     VERSUS
            Rajeshwar Digambarrao Sanlapurkar & ors.                         ….Respondents
                                             .......
            Mr. S.J. Salunke, Advocate for petitioner
            Mr. S.V. Kulkarni, Advocate for R.No.1.
            Mr. V.V. Ghansawdh, Advocate holding for
            Mr. M.V. Thorat, Advocate for R.No.3, 6, 7 & 9
            Mr. A.R. Rathod, Advocate for R.No.10
                                             ....…

                                            CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
                                            DATE        : 8th JUNE, 2026
            PER COURT :

            1.              Mr. Kulkarni, learned counsel for respondent No.1 has
     This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //   Writ Petition No.2210/2020
                                            :: 2 ::


moved this motion for speaking to the minutes of the order dated

30th April 2026. He submits that, his appearance for respondent

No.1 has not been shown in the order.


2.              In the order dated 30th April 2026, appearance of

learned counsel Mr. S.V. Kulkarni be shown for respondent No.1.

Motion for speaking to minutes stands disposed of.



                                        (SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.)


fmp/-


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.