Bombay High Court
P. J. VERGHESE AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioners filed a criminal writ petition but failed to appear for hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after November 20, 2013. The court observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non-prosecution. No substantive merits of the petition were considered. The dismissal was based solely on procedural non‑compliance.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate consequence when petitioners fail to appear and do not pursue a criminal writ petition?
Subjects
- criminal writ petition
- non‑prosecution
- dismissal
- procedural default
- court procedure
Judgment
WAKLE
MANOJ
JANARDHAN Manoj 54-WP-2232-2013.doc
Digitally signed by
WAKLE MANOJ
JANARDHAN
Date: 2026.01.17
10:08:42 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2232 OF 2013
P. J. Verghese & Ors. …..Petitioners
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. …..Respondents
__________________________________________
None for the Petitioners.
Mr. Vinod Chate, APP for the Respondent-State.
__________________________________________
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ.
DATE : 13th JANUARY, 2026.
P.C.:-
1) None for Petitioners, when called out for hearing.
2) Record indicates that, after 20th November 2013, Petitioners
and/or their Advocate have not taken any steps to circulate the Petition,
even for once.
2.1) It appears that, the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing
the Petition.
3) Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
1/1
Checking your session…