Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

KIMTILAL MANOHARLAL DANGversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Kimtilal Manoharlal Dang, filed Writ Petition No. 2233 of 2015 in the Bombay High Court. After the hearing on 20th November 2017, the petitioner and his counsel failed to take any steps to circulate the petition or appear before the court. The court observed that the petitioner appeared disinterested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non-prosecution. The dismissal was recorded by both judges on 4th March 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear and pursue the case?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • non-prosecution
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

            ssm                                                         32-wp2233.2015.doc

                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                  CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                   WRIT PETITION NO. 2233 OF 2015

       Kimtilal Manoharlal Dang                                         …..Petitioner

                 Vs.

       The State Of Maharashtra & Anr.                   …..Respondents
                       ____________________________________

       None for the Petitioner.
       Smt. P.P. Shinde APP, for the Respondent-State.
                         ____________________________________

                                               CORAM :       A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                             KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                 DATE :      4th MARCH, 2026.

       P.C.:-

       1)                   None for Petitioner when called out for hearing.

       2)                   Record indicates that, after 20 th November, 2017, Petitioner

       and/or his Advocate has not taken any steps to circulate the Petition, even

       for once.

       2.1)                 It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

       Petition.

       3)                   Dismissed for non-prosecution.




                   (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                             (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

              Digitally signed
          by SANJIV
SANJIV    SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR
MASHALKAR Date: 2026.03.06
              18:54:41 +0530
                                                                                             1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.