Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

TATA CAPITAL HOUSING FINANCE LTD. THR. LEGAL MANAGER SHAMVEL BAJIRAO PATOLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. THE OFFICE OF GOV. PLEADER

Disposal
Allowed To be withdrawn

Holding

The petition is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty granted to file the application under Section 14 of the Securitisation Act.

Summary

Tata Capital Housing Finance Ltd. filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking leave to withdraw the petition and to obtain liberty to file an application before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Solapur, for an expeditious hearing under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. The petitioner, through counsel, requested that the court allow the withdrawal and grant the said liberty. The court examined the request and found no impediment to permitting the withdrawal. Consequently, the court disposed of the writ petition as withdrawn, granting the liberty sought. The order was pronounced by Justices Sharmila U. Deshmukh and Neeraj P. Dhote on August 29, 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn at the petitioner's request
  • Whether the court can grant liberty to file a separate application under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • Section 14
  • Securitisation Act
  • expeditious hearing
  • high court order

Judgment

                                                                                       43-WP-2260-2026.doc


                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                               CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              WRIT PETITION NO. 2260 OF 2026

                        Tata Capital Housing Finance Ltd. ...Petitioner.
                                Versus
                        The State of Maharashtra          ...Respondent.
                                                     ——————
                        Mr. Suresh Patil, i/b. Mr. Jolly Bhutelo for the Petitioner.
                        Mr. A. A. Anaspurkar, AGP for the Respondent-State.
                                                           ——————
                                                              Coram :     Sharmila U. Deshmukh &
                                                                          Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ.
                                                              Date      : August 29, 2026.
                        P. C. :

                        1.        The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner, on instructions,

                        seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to ile an application

                        before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Solapur for expeditious

                        hearing of the application under Section 14 of the Securitisation and

                        Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest

                        Act, 2002.

                        2.        The Petition is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed

                        for.



                         [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.]                             [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]

           Digitally
           signed by
           RAJU
RAJU       DATTATRAYA
DATTATRAYA GAIKWAD
GAIKWAD    Date:
           2026.08.31
           12:26:38
           +0530




                        Gaikwad RD                             1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.