Bombay High Court
SHEVANTIBAI YASHWANT BARADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Shevantibai Yashwant Barad, failed to appear for the hearing of her writ petition and, according to the record, made no effort to advance the petition since its filing on 17 May 2018. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. No arguments or evidence were presented by the petitioner, and the respondent's counsel, Ms. P.P. Shinde, appeared for the State. The dismissal was ordered by the bench of Justices A.S. Gadkari and Kamal Khata.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner’s failure to appear and take any steps to pursue the petition
Subjects
- non-prosecution
- petition dismissal
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
- court procedure
Judgment
pmk 52-WP-2273-2018.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2273 OF 2018
Shevantibai Yashwant Barad … Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Ms. P.P. Shinde, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 12th June, 2026
P.C.:-
1) None appears for Petitioner, when called out for hearing.
2) Record indicates that, since the filing of the Petition i.e. 17 th
May, 2018, neither the Petitioner nor her Advocate has taken any steps to
circulate the Petition, even once.
2.1) It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the
Petition.
3) Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(KAMAL KHATA, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
1/1
Checking your session…