Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SURYAKANT SOPAN THAKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUG REVENUE MINISTER , REVENUE DEPT. OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Allowed To be withdrawn

Holding

The petition was withdrawn and disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Suryakant Sopan Thakar, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Ramchandra Wagh, applied for unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.

Subjects

  • withdrawal
  • writ petition
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • petition disposed

Judgment

HEMANT
CHANDERSEN
SHIV
Digitally signed by
                           H.C. SHIV                                                 1.w2288.26.doc
HEMANT
CHANDERSEN SHIV
Date: 2026.02.20                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
13:40:46 +0300
                                               CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              WRIT PETITION NO.2288 OF 2026

                      Suryakant Sopan Thakar                   …..Petitioner
                            Vs.
                      The State of Maharashtra                 …..Respondent

                                        __________________________________________

                      Mr. Ramchandra Wagh, Advocate i/b Ms. Mrunmai Rokade for the
                      Petitioner.
                      Mr. S. H. Kankal, AGP for the Respondent-State.
                                    __________________________________________

                                                         CORAM :     A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                     SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ.
                                                           DATE :    17th FEBRUARY, 2026.


                      P.C.:-

                      1)               Learned Advocate Mr. Wagh for the Petitioner, on instructions,

                      seeks leave to withdraw Petition unconditionally.

                      1.1)             Leave granted.

                      2)               Disposed off as withdrawn.



                                (SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.)                     (A.S. GADKARI, J.)




                                                                                                      1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.