Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

DEVJI SOMJI PATEL AND OTHERSversusTHE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court treated the respondents' statement as an undertaking and ordered them to decide the applications within four weeks.

Summary

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking directions to the Union of India and the Central Railway to decide their applications dated 07.07.2025 and 14.07.2025 within the statutory time limit. Respondent No.1, represented by counsel, waived notice and, together with the State, stated that the applications would be decided within four weeks from the date of the order. The Court accepted this statement as a binding undertaking. Accordingly, the Court directed the respondents to decide the applications within the stipulated four‑week period and disposed of the writ petition.

Issues considered

  • Whether a High Court can treat a respondent's statement as an undertaking and issue a binding direction to decide pending applications within a specified time.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • administrative direction
  • time limit
  • railway
  • high court order

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:13375-DB


                                                                        937-wp-2294-2026.odt



                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                  937 WRIT PETITION NO.2294 OF 2026

             1.    Shri. Devji s/o Somji Patel
             2.    Hardas s/o Kanji Patel
             3.    Litesh s/o Dhanjibhai Patel
             4.    Haresh s/o Vishrambhai Patel                       .. Petitioners

                         Versus

                   The Union of India Through the
                   Divisional Railway Manager Central
                   Railway Bhusawal, Tq. Bhusawal,
                   Dist. Jalgaon and others                           .. Respondents

                                                      ...
             Mr. V. R. Jain, Advocate for the Petitioners.
             Mr. S. B. Narwade, AGP for Respondents/State.
             Mr. S. W. Munde, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
                                                      ...

                                     CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI &
                                                  HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ.

                                        DATE : 27 MARCH 2026

             ORDER :


             .     Present petition has been filed for directions to respondent Nos.1

             and 2 to decide the petitioners’ applications dated 07.07.2025 and

             14.07.2025 within stipulated period.


             2     Learned Advocate Mr. S. W. Munde waives notice for respondent

             No.1 and learned AGP waives notice for respondents/State. Upon

             instructions from respondent No.1 and respondent No.2, learned


                                                  [1]
                                                        937-wp-2294-2026.odt



Advocate for respondent No.1 and learned AGP makes a statement that

respondent Nos.1 and 2 would decide the petitioners’ applications dated

07.07.2025 and 14.07.2025 within a period of four weeks from today.


3.    We take the said statement as undertaking and dispose of the writ

petition by giving directions to respondent Nos.1 and 2 to decide the

petitioners’ applications dated 07.07.2025 and 14.07.2025 within a

period of four weeks from today.



[ HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR ]                  [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ]
      JUDGE                                        JUDGE


scm




                                   [2]


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.