Bombay High Court
GANESH RAMRAO PAWAR AND ANOTHERversusDNYANESHWAR SURBHAN SARANGDHAR
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
Summary
The petitioners filed a writ petition (No. 2322 of 2016) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, seeking relief against the respondent. After a ten-year lapse, counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petition had become infructuous due to the passage of time. The court considered whether the delay rendered the petition incapable of being entertained. Relying on the principle that a petition which has become moot cannot proceed, the bench held the petition to be infructuous. Consequently, the petition was disposed of without any further orders.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition is infructuous due to the lapse of time
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- limitation
- petition disposal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:19808
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.2322 OF 2016
Ganesh s/o Ramrao Pawar & anr. ….Petitioners
VERSUS
Dnyaneshwar s/o Surbhan Sarangdhar …..Respondent
.......
Mr. D.R. Jaybhar, Advocate for petitioners
Mr. N.K. Chaudhari, Advocate for respondent
....…
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
DATE : 30th APRIL, 2026
PER COURT :
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, by
passage of time, this petition has become infructuous. In view
thereof, the petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
(SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.)
fmp/-
Checking your session…