Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

VILAS SURYAKANT MAYEKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner filed a writ petition on 28 May 2018 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear or act on the petition

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • Bombay High Court
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

                         sbw                                                     297-wp-2326-2018.doc

                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                          CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                            WRIT PETITION NO.2326 OF 2018

                    Vilas Suryakant Mayekar                                 … Petitioner

                             V/s.

                    The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                         … Respondents




                    None for the Petitioner.
                    Mr. J. P. Yagnik, APP, for the Respondent-State.


                                                        CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                     KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                          DATE :     18th April 2026

                    P.C.:-

                    1)              None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

                    2)              Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

                    28th May, 2018, the Petitioner and/or his Advocate has not taken any steps

                    to circulate the Petition, even for once.

                    2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

                    Petition.

                    3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                     (A.S. GADKARI, J.)


       Digitally
       signed by
       SANDHYA
                                                                                                        1/1
SANDHYA BHAGU
BHAGU   WADHWA
WADHWA Date:
       2026.04.23
       12:02:11
       +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.