Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PRAVINA TALAKSHI SHAH ALIAS POLADIA AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners filed a writ petition on 22 April 2019 in the Bombay High Court. No petitioner appeared for hearing and their counsel made no effort to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. The dismissal was ordered by a two‑judge bench.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioners fail to appear or take steps to advance the petition

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                             sns                                                  29-WP-2345-2019.doc

                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              WRIT PETITION NO.2345 OF 2019

                      Pravina Talakshi Shah Alias
                      Poladia & Anr.                                                … Petitioners

                               V/s.

                      The State Of Maharashtra & Ors                                … Respondents



                      None for the Petitioners.
                      Mr. Ashish I. Satpute, APP for the Respondent-State.
                      None for Respondent No.2.


                                                          CORAM :  A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                   KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                            DATE : 10th July, 2026

                      P.C.:-

                      1)              None for the Petitioners when called out for hearing.

                      2)              Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

                      22nd April, 2019, neither the Petitioners nor their Advocate have taken any

                      steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

                      2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing

                      the Petition.

                      3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                   (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                    (A.S. GADKARI, J.)


         Digitally
         signed by
                                                                                                        1/1
         SUMEDH
SUMEDH   NAMDEO
NAMDEO   SONAWANE
SONAWANE Date:
         2026.07.15
         15:19:41
         +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.