Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

DNYANESHWAR PANDURANG MADANE AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court directed the State to decide the revision application within three months from the date of the order.

Summary

Petitioners Dnyaneshwar Pandurang Madane and another filed a writ petition seeking directions to the State of Maharashtra (respondent No.1) to decide a revision application dated 17 December 2025 within a stipulated time. The State, through its Additional Government Pleader, waived notice and stated it would decide the revision within three months from the date of the order. The Court treated this statement as an undertaking. Accordingly, the Court directed respondent No.1 to decide the revision application within three months from the date of the order and disposed of the writ petition.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Court can direct the State to decide a pending revision application within a specific time frame

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • revision application
  • direction
  • procedural order
  • high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:9249-DB


                                                                         902-wp-2349-2026.odt


                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                 902 WRIT PETITION NO.2349 OF 2026

                              Dnyaneshwar Pandurang Madane And Another
                                                  VERSUS
                                  The State Of Maharashtra And Others


                                                     ...
             Mr. V. S. Undre, Advocate for the Petitioners.
             Mr. R. S. Wani, AGP for Respondents/State.
                                                     ...


                                      CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI &
                                                    HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ.
                                         DATE : 04 MARCH 2026

             ORDER :


             .      Not on board. Upon mentioning, matter is taken on board.


             2.     Present petition has been filed for directions to respondent No.1 to

             decide the revision application filed by the petitioner on 17.12.2025

             within stipulated period.


             3.     Learned AGP waives notice for respondent Nos.1 to 3/State and

             upon instructions from respondent No.1 makes a statement that

             respondent No.1 would decide the revision application dated 17.12.2025

             filed by the petitioner within a period of three months from today.


                                                     [1]
                                                        902-wp-2349-2026.odt


4.    We take the said statement as undertaking and dispose of the writ

petition by giving direction to respondent No.1 to decide the revision

application dated 17.12.2025 filed by the petitioner within a period of

three months from today.



[ HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR ]                 [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ]
       JUDGE                                      JUDGE


scm




                                  [2]


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.