Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

HIRAMAN SURESH DESHMUKHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRERTARY STATE EXISE AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court treated the State's statement as an undertaking and directed it to decide the revision petition within three months.

Summary

The petitioner, Hiraman Suresh Deshmukh, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of Maharashtra to decide a revision petition he had filed on 06-11-2025. The petitioner alleged that the State had not yet ruled on the revision within the prescribed period. The State, through its Additional Government Pleader, waived notice and stated that it would decide the revision within three months from the date of the order. The Court accepted this statement as an undertaking and directed the State to decide the revision petition within three months. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed by granting the requested direction.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court can issue a direction to the State to decide a pending revision petition within a specified time frame

Subjects

  • Writ Petition
  • Revision
  • Direction
  • Procedural Law
  • State Excise

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:9248


                                                                            904-wp-2351-2026.odt


                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                  904 WRIT PETITION NO.2351 OF 2026


                                        Hiraman Suresh Deshmukh
                                                  VERSUS
                  State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary State Excise And Others


                                                     ...
             Mr. V. S. Undre, Advocate for the Petitioner.
             Ms. N. B. Kamble, AGP for Respondents/State.
                                                     ...


                                       CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI &
                                                     HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ.
                                         DATE : 04 MARCH 2026

             ORDER :


             .       Not on board. Upon mentioning, matter is taken on board.


             2.      Present petition has been filed for directions to respondent No.1 to

             decide the revision petition filed by the petitioner on 06.11.2025 within

             stipulated period.


             3.      Learned AGP waives notice for respondents/State and upon

             instructions from respondent No.1 makes a statement that respondent

             No.1 would decide the revision petition dated 06.11.2025 filed by the

             petitioner within a period of three months from today.


                                                     [1]
                                                        904-wp-2351-2026.odt


4.    We take the said statement as undertaking and dispose of the writ

petition by giving direction to respondent No.1 to decide the revision

application dated 06.11.2025 filed by the petitioner within a period of

three months from today.



[ HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR ]                 [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ]
       JUDGE                                      JUDGE


scm




                                  [2]


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.