Bombay High Court
CHANDAN LUNAWAT AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The petition is deemed infructuous and is disposed of.
Summary
Petitioner No.1 died during the pendency of the writ petition, leading the petitioner to argue that the petition should abate. The court examined the record and noted that, irrespective of the death, the petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time. Consequently, the court held that the petition could no longer proceed. The petition was therefore disposed of as infructuous. No substantive merits of the underlying criminal matter were addressed.
Issues considered
- Does the death of a petitioner during pendency abate the writ petition?
- Is a writ petition considered infructuous due to the passage of time?
Subjects
- writ petition
- abate
- infructuous
- death of petitioner
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
Judgment
DTG 25-Wp-2441-2015.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2441 OF 2015
Chandan Lunawat & Anr. … Petitioners
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
_______________________________________
Mr. Mayur Tamore i/b Madhusudan Pareek for Petitioners.
Mr. Vinod Chate, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
_______________________________________
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ.
DATE : 27th February 2026
P.C. :
1) Learned Advocate for Petitioner submitted that, during the
pendency of present Petition, Petitioner No.1 has passed away and therefore
it stands abated qua him.
1.1) Perusal of record indicates that, even otherwise, due to passage
of time, Petition has become infructuous.
2) Petition is accordingly disposed off as infructuous.
( SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
1/1
Checking your session…