Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

DEVIPRASAD RAMADHAR SONARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner filed a writ petition on 15 July 2016 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the court found that the petition had not been prosecuted. The petition was therefore dismissed for non-prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear and pursue the case?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non-prosecution
  • dismissal
  • court procedure
  • failure to appear

Judgment

                             sns                                                   30-wp-2445-2016.doc

                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              WRIT PETITION NO.2445 OF 2016

                      Deviprasad Ramadhar Sonar                               … Petitioner

                               V/s.

                      State of Maharashtra & Ors.                             … Respondents




                      None for the Petitioner.
                      Smt. Madhavi H. Mhatre, APP, for the Respondent-State.


                                                          CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                       KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                            DATE :     24th March 2026

                      P.C.:-

                      1)              None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

                      2)              Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

                      15th July, 2016, the Petitioner and/or his Advocate has not taken any steps

                      to circulate the Petition, even for once.

                      2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

                      Petition.

                      3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                   (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                    (A.S. GADKARI, J.)


         Digitally
         signed by
                                                                                                         1/1
         SUMEDH
SUMEDH   NAMDEO
NAMDEO   SONAWANE
SONAWANE Date:
         2026.03.26
         15:19:34
         +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.