Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

M/S. FIBERCON INDUSTRIES LTD. AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

Fibercon Industries Ltd. and another filed Writ Petition No.2457 of 2017 in the Bombay High Court challenging a criminal matter. The petition was listed for hearing but the petitioners failed to appear. The court observed that after 14 November 2019 the petitioners or their counsel did not take any step to circulate the petition even once. It was concluded that the petitioners were not interested in pursuing the relief sought. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed on the ground of non‑prosecution by the petitioners?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                             sbw                                                  25-WP-2457-2017.doc

                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                             CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                               WRIT PETITION NO.2457 OF 2017

                       Fibercon Industries Ltd. & Anr.                       … Petitioners

                                V/s.

                       The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                       … Respondents



                       None for the Petitioners.
                       Smt. P.P.Shinde, APP, for the Respondent-State.


                                                          CORAM :       A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                        KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                            DATE :      10th April, 2026.

                       P.C.:-

                       1)              None for Petitioner, when called out for hearing.

                       2)              Record indicates that, after 14th November, 2019, Petitioners

                       and/or their Advocate have not taken any steps to circulate the Petition,

                       even for once.

                       2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing

                       the Petition.

                       3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                   (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                     (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
          Digitally signed
          by SANDHYA
SANDHYA BHAGU
        WADHWA
BHAGU   Date:
WADHWA 2026.04.20
          13:40:29
          +0530




                                                                                                        1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.