Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

JINESH KANTILAL MALDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Jinesh Kantilal Malde, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. After the hearing date of 16 December 2021, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The petitioner failed to appear when called for hearing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear or take steps to pursue the relief

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • high court
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

                             sns                                                34-WP-2486-2019.doc




                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              WRIT PETITION NO.2486 OF 2019

                      Jinesh Kantilal Malde                                 … Petitioner

                               V/s.

                      The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                       … Respondents



                      None for the Petitioner.
                      Mr. Ashish I. Satpute, APP for the Respondent-State.


                                                         CORAM :  A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                  KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                           DATE : 10th July, 2026

                      P.C.:-

                      1)              None for Petitioner when called out for hearing.

                      2)              Record indicates that, after 16th December, 2021, neither the

                      Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any steps to circulate the Petition,

                      even once.

                      2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

                      Petition.

                      3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                   (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                   (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

         Digitally
         signed by
         SUMEDH
                                                                                                      1/1
SUMEDH   NAMDEO
NAMDEO   SONAWANE
SONAWANE Date:
         2026.07.15
         13:32:08
         +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.