Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

M/S. RIDDHI SIDDHI COMPANY THR. ITS PARTNER KAILAS C. PATIL AND ANRversusPUSHPA KHANDU PAWAR AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court ordered that the revision application be decided within six months from the date of communication of the order and disposed of the writ petition.

Summary

The petitioners, M/s. Riddhi Siddhi Company, filed a writ petition seeking direction on a pending revision application. The respondents, represented by the Attorney General of the State, contended that the revision should be decided within six months of the order's communication. The Court, after hearing counsel, directed the Revenue Minister to decide the revision application within the stipulated six‑month period on its merits and in accordance with law. No substantive merits of the revision were addressed. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether the revision application should be decided within a specified time frame of six months
  • Whether the writ petition seeking such direction should be entertained

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • revision application
  • time limit
  • Revenue Minister
  • High Court of Bombay
  • disposal

Judgment

                              Ingale                                                      49-WP2490-26.odt



         Digitally signed               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
         by URMILA
URMILA   PRAMOD
         INGALE                                 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PRAMOD   Date:
INGALE   2026.03.05
         17:56:00
         +0530

                                               WRIT PETITION NO. 2490 OF 2026

                            M/s. Riddhi Siddhi Company
                            (Nee: M/s. Riddhi Siddhi Construction
                             Company) and anr.                            … Petitioners
                                  Versus
                            Pushpa Khandu Pawar and ors.                  .… Respondents

                                                             ****
                            Mr. Jayesh Joshi, for the Petitioners.
                            Smt. P. J. Gavhane, AGP, for the Respondent-State.
                            Ms. Dhanurkar, Law Officer, Revenue, present.

                                                                ****

                                                              CORAM :     M.S.KARNIK &
                                                                          S.M.MODAK, JJ.

                                                                DATE :    4th MARCH 2026

                            P.C. :


                            1.         Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AGP.


                            2.         Learned AGP in all fairness and on instructions from the

                            respondents submits that the revision application which is the

                            subject matter of this petition will be decided within a period of 6

                            months from the date of communication of this order on its own

                            merits and in accordance with law.




                                                               1
 Ingale                                              49-WP2490-26.odt



3.        In view of above, the Revenue Minister is requested to

decide the revision application within a period of 6 months from

the date of communication of this order on its own merits and in

accordance with law.


4.    The writ petition is disposed of.



(S.M.MODAK, J.)                             (M.S.KARNIK, J.)




                                2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.