Bombay High Court
SHANKARSINH CHANDSINH THAKURversusBALIRAM BALAJI KALYANKAR AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition was disposed of as there was nothing left to adjudicate after the withdrawal of the underlying suit.
Summary
The petitioner, Shankarsinh Chandsinh Thakur, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Respondent No.4, represented by Advocate Hamzakhan I. Pathan, informed the Court that the underlying civil suit (R.C.S. No.242 of 216) had been withdrawn. The Court considered whether any relief could still be granted in the writ petition after the withdrawal of the suit. Finding that the petition was predicated on the existence of the pending suit and that no cause of action remained, the Court held that there was nothing left to adjudicate. Consequently, the petition was disposed of.
Issues considered
- What is the effect on a writ petition when the underlying civil suit on which it is based is withdrawn?
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal of suit
- disposal of petition
- civil procedure
Judgment
1 of 1 926-WP.2508.2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
926 WRIT PETITION NO. 2508 OF 2018
SHANKARSINH CHANDSINH THAKUR
VERSUS
BALIRAM BALAJI KALYANKAR AND OTHERS
...
Mr. Abhijeet Choudhary, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. Hamzakhan I. Pathan, Advocate for Respondent No.4.
...
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
DATE : 27th FEBRUARY, 2026
P.C.:-
1. Mr. Pathan, learned Advocate for Respondent No.4 submits
that the suit i.e. R.C.S. No.242 of 216, which was pending, has been
withdrawn.
2. In view thereof, nothing survives in this petition and the
same is disposed of.
(SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.)
Tauseef
Checking your session…