Bombay High Court

SAHEBRAO SHANKAR BHOJANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF
Bench: SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Holding

The petition was allowed on an interim basis after the Court relied on the Apex Court’s judgment.

Summary

Sahebrao Shankar Bhojane filed Writ Petition No. 2511 of 2021 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition raised the question of whether the petitioner was entitled to an interim order pending final determination of the matter. The Court, after referring to its earlier order dated 12 February 2021 and relying on a judgment of the Supreme Court, examined the merits of the interim relief sought. It concluded that the circumstances warranted the grant of interim relief and accordingly passed a detailed order. Consequently, the petition was allowed in terms of the interim order.

Subjects

interim order
writ petition
high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:15244
                                                                            47.WP.2511.2021.odt



                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                   WRIT PETITION NO. 2511 OF 2021

          Sahebrao Shankar Bhojane                                     ...Petitioner

                   Versus

          The State of Maharashtra and Others                          ...Respondents

                                             ***
           Mr. Kale Yogesh D., Advocate for the Petitioner.
           Mr. B. A. Shinde, AGP for Respondent – State.
                                             ***

                                                 CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
                                                 DATE : APRIL 08, 2026
          PER COURT :

          1.                 This Court vide its order dated 12th February 2021, has

          relied upon the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court and passed a

          detailed order.


          2.                 In view of the above, the petition is allowed in terms of the

          interim order.




                                                    ( SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. )




          Shrikant Malani                                                          Page 1 of 1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…