Bombay High Court
AMIT RAJKUMAR SINGHANIAversusTHE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
Amit Rajkumar Singhania filed Writ Petition No.2540 of 2017 in the Bombay High Court against the Union of India. The petitioner failed to appear when called for hearing and, after 19 July 2017, took no steps to circulate the petition. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief sought. The issue of non‑prosecution was then considered. The court held that a petition which is not actively pursued may be dismissed. Accordingly, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution?
Subjects
- writ petition
- non‑prosecution
- dismissal
- high court
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
Judgment
pmk 45-WP-2540-2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2540 OF 2017
Amit Rajkumar Singhania … Petitioner
V/s.
The Union of India & Ors. … Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Smt. Madhavi H. Mhatre, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 18th April, 2026
P.C.:-
1) None for Petitioner, when called out for hearing.
2) Record indicates that, after 19th July, 2017 Petitioner and/or his
Advocate has not taken any steps to circulate the Petition, even for once.
2.1) It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the
Petition.
3) Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(KAMAL KHATA, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
1/1
Checking your session…