Bombay High Court
MEENA BHIMANAND SONAVANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASTHRA AND ANR.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
Meena Bhimanand Sonavane filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court on 3 May 2019. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and neither she nor her counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief sought. Consequently, the judges observed that the petition remained inactive since its filing. In view of this non‑prosecution, the court dismissed the petition. The dismissal was entered without any substantive consideration of merits.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear or take steps to pursue it
Subjects
- writ petition
- non‑prosecution
- dismissal
- high court
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
Judgment
DTG 244-Wp.2611.2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2611 OF 2019
Meena Bhimanand Sonavane … Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents
_______________________________________
None for Petitioner.
Mr. Ashish I. Satpute, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
_______________________________________
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 17th June 2026
P.C. :
1) None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.
2) Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.
3rd May 2019, neither the Petitioner nor her Advocate has taken any steps to
circulate the Petition, even once.
2.1) It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the
Petition.
3) Dismissed for non-prosecution.
( KAMAL KHATA, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
1/1
Checking your session…