Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MR. URVINDER PAL SINGHversusVERSOVA POLICE STATION AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Mr. Urvinder Pal Singh, filed a writ petition but failed to appear or take any steps to advance the petition after the first hearing on 1 December 2016. The court noted that the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. No substantive factual or legal issues were addressed. The dismissal was entered without any further order.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear or act.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • court procedure

Judgment

                ssm                                                       37-wp2635.2015.doc

                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                    WRIT PETITION NO. 2635 OF 2015

          Mr. Urvinder Pal Singh                                   …..Petitioner

                      Vs.

          Versova Police Station & Ors.                            …..Respondents

                                  ____________________________________

          None for the Petitioner.
          Smt. Ranjana D. Humane APP, for the Respondent-State.
                            ____________________________________

                                                CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                             KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                   DATE :    4th MARCH, 2026.
          P.C.:-

          1)                 None for the Petitioner.

          2)                 Record indicates that, even on earlier occasion i.e. on 1 st

          December, 2016 none had appeared for the Petitioner.            That,    after       1st

          December, 2016, Petitioner and/or his Advocate has not taken any steps to

          circulate the Petition, even for once.

          3)                 It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

          Petition.

          4)                 Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.



                        (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                         (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

          Digitally signed
          by SANJIV                                                                            1/1
SANJIV    SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR
MASHALKAR Date:
          2026.03.09
          12:01:29 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.