Bombay High Court
SHANKAR BHAGAJI BANGARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition is dismissed in default for want of prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Shankar Bhagaji Bangar, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, in 2020. The petitioner failed to appear before the court in both the morning and afternoon sessions on the scheduled date. The court observed that the petition had been pending since 2020 without any prosecution by the petitioner. Consequently, the court held that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the matter. The petition was therefore dismissed in default for want of prosecution.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate consequence when a petitioner fails to prosecute a writ petition for an extended period?
Subjects
- writ petition
- default dismissal
- want of prosecution
- procedural law
- High Court
Judgment
957-WP-2649-2020.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
957 WRIT PETITION NO. 2649 OF 2020
Shankar Bhagaji Bangar
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
…..
Ms. M. L. Sangit, AGP for the Respondents - State
…..
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
DATE : 08.01.2026
PER COURT :
1. In the morning session, when the matter was called out, none
appears for the Petitioner and, therefore, the matter was kept back. In
the afternoon session also, when the matter was called out, nobody
appears for the Petitioner.
2. This Petition is pending since 2020 and the same is not
prosecuted. It seems that the Petitioner is not interested in prosecuting
the matter. Hence, the Petition is dismissed in default for want of
prosecution.
[SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.]
Sameer/January-2026
1
Checking your session…