Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

NITENDRASINGH KUMARSING PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The record shows that after 20 April 2018, the petitioner or his counsel did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court inferred that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution. No substantive merits were addressed.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear or take steps to pursue the case

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

               ssm                                                   192-WP266.2018.doc

                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                               CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                 WRIT PETITION NO. 266 OF 2018

          Nitendrasingh Kumarsing Patil                        …..Petitioner

                   Vs.

          State Of Maharashtra & Ors.                          …..Respondents

                              ____________________________________

          None for the Petitioner.
          Mr. J.P. Yagnik APP, for the Respondent-State.
                            ____________________________________

                                            CORAM :       A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                          KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                              DATE :      18th APRIL, 2026.

          P.C.:-

          1)             None for Petitioner when called out for hearing.

          2)             Record indicates that, after 20th April, 2018, Petitioner and/or

          his Advocate has not taken any steps to circulate the Petition, even for once.

          2.1)           It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

          Petition.

          3)             Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                     (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                        (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

          Digitally signed
          by SANJIV
          SHARNAPPA
SANJIV    MASHALKAR
SHARNAPPA
MASHALKAR Date:
          2026.04.27
          18:46:32
          +0530
                                                                                          1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.