Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ABDUL RAHIM ALLAUDDIN GORIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Abdul Rahim Allauddin Gori, filed a writ petition on 19 December 2018 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at the hearing, and the record shows that the petitioner made no effort to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief sought. Consequently, the court held that the petition could not be entertained further. The petition was therefore dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear and pursue the case

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • court procedure
  • petitioner's non‑appearance

Judgment

                             sns                                                  37-WP-2675-2019.doc




                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              WRIT PETITION NO.2675 OF 2019

                      Abdul Rahim Allauddin Gori                                    … Petitioner

                               V/s.

                      The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                               … Respondents



                      None for the Petitioner.
                      Mr. J. P. Yagnik, APP for the Respondent-State.


                                                          CORAM :  A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                   KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                            DATE : 10th July, 2026

                      P.C.:-

                      1)              None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

                      2)              Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

                      19th December, 2018, neither the Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any

                      steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

                      2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

                      Petition.

                      3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                   (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                    (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

         Digitally
         signed by
         SUMEDH
                                                                                                        1/1
SUMEDH   NAMDEO
NAMDEO   SONAWANE
SONAWANE Date:
         2026.07.15
         13:32:06
         +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.