Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

VINOD PREMCHAND MAHATOLEversusRAMCHANDRA BAGANLAL MAHATOLE AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

Vinod Premchand Mahatole filed writ petition No. 2715 of 2022 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against Ramchandra Baganlal Mahatole and others. The petition remained pending for admission as the petitioner failed to appear in both morning and afternoon sessions. On 23 April 2026 the court observed the petitioner’s lack of interest and, as a last opportunity, listed the matter for dismissal on 28 April 2026. The petitioner again did not appear on the scheduled date. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution, without addressing the substantive claims.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate consequence when a petitioner fails to appear and prosecute a writ petition?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • civil procedure
  • non-appearance

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:19671
             Dilwale                                           1                     902-WP-2715-22.odt




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                 902 WRIT PETITION NO. 2715 OF 2022

                                        Vinod Premchand Mahatole
                                                 VERSUS

                               Ramchandra Baganlal Mahatole And Others
                                                …..
                                    CORAM       : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
                                      DATE             : 28.04.2026

             PER COURT :
             1.        On 23.04.2026, following order is passed:-

                   “1. None appears for the Petitioner. In the morning session, when the
                   matter was called out, none appeared. In the afternoon session also, none
                   appeared on behalf of the Petitioner. The matter has been pending since
                   2022 for Admission. It appears that the Petitioner is not interested in
                   prosecuting the matter.
                   2. However, by way of a last opportunity, list the matter “for dismissal” on
                   28.04.2026.”


             2.        Today also none appears for the petitioner. Hence, the petition is

             dismissed for want of prosecution.


                                                            [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ]
                                                                      JUDGE


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.