Bombay High Court
MOHAMMED GULAM ROSHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 21 May 2019 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at any hearing, and the record shows that the petition was never circulated or pursued. The Court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in continuing the proceedings. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. No substantive merits of the petition were examined, and the dismissal was final.
Issues considered
- Can a writ petition be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear or take steps to pursue it?
Subjects
- writ petition
- non‑prosecution
- dismissal
- high court
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
Judgment
DTG 255-Wp.2725.2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2725 OF 2019
Mohammed Gulam Roshan … Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
_______________________________________
None for Petitioner.
Mr. Ashish I. Satpute, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
_______________________________________
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 17th June 2026
P.C. :
1) None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.
2) Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.
21st May 2019, neither the Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any steps to
circulate the Petition, even once.
2.1) It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the
Petition.
3) Dismissed for non-prosecution.
( KAMAL KHATA, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
1/1
Checking your session…