Bombay High Court
ANADA KERBA CHOPWADversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- ARUN R PEDNEKER
Holding
The petition is dismissed as infructuous because the passage of time has made the relief sought unavailable.
Summary
Anada Kerba Chopwad filed a writ petition (No. 2727 of 2009) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition remained pending for several years. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the passage of time had rendered the petition infructuous. The Court examined whether the petition could still be entertained given the delay. Finding that the relief sought could no longer be granted due to the lapse of time, the Court dismissed the petition as infructuous. The order was pronounced by Justice Arun R. Pedneker on 30 April 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition is maintainable after a prolonged lapse of time rendering it infructuous
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- limitation period
- maintainability
- High Court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:19513
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
912 WRIT PETITION NO. 2727 OF 2009
ANADA KERBA CHOPWAD
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
...
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. J.B. Paikrao h/f. Mr. G.G. Suryawanshi
AGP for Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr. P.M. Kulkarni
...
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
Dated : April 30, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to passage
of time, the matter has become infructuous.
2. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. )
ssc/
Checking your session…