Bombay High Court
RAVSAHEB DATTU SHINGATEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Ravsaheb Dattu Shingate, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The court noted that after July 1, 2019, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. It was observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court concluded that the petition was abandoned. The judges dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear or take steps to pursue it
Subjects
- non‑prosecution
- petition dismissal
- high court
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
- procedural default
Judgment
DTG 259-Wp.2751.2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2751 OF 2019
Ravsaheb Dattu Shingate … Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
_______________________________________
None for Petitioner.
Mr. Ashish I. Satpute, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
_______________________________________
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 17th June 2026
P.C. :
1) None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.
2) Record indicates that, after 1st July 2019, neither the Petitioner
nor his Advocate has taken any steps to circulate the Petition, even once.
2.1) It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the
Petition.
3) Dismissed for non-prosecution.
( KAMAL KHATA, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
1/1
Checking your session…