Bombay High Court
MR. ANANT CHANDRAKANT CHAVANversusGRAMPANCHAYAT ARATHI, THROUGH GRAMSEVAK AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- AMIT BORKAR
Holding
The petition is infructuous and is disposed of because the cause of action has become stale.
Summary
The petitioner, Sayali Deepak, filed a writ petition challenging a disqualification arising from a 2009 election. The petition was filed in 2026, more than a decade after the election. The Court examined whether the petition remained maintainable given the considerable lapse of time. It held that the passage of time had rendered the matter moot, as there was nothing left to adjudicate. Consequently, the writ petition was declared infructuous and disposed of without any costs.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition challenging an election disqualification filed more than a decade after the election is maintainable
- Whether the petition should be dismissed as infructuous due to the lapse of time
Subjects
- election disqualification
- stale petition
- writ petition
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- timeliness
Judgment
60-WP-2752-13.doc
Sayali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SAYALI WRIT PETITION NO. 2752 OF 2013
DEEPAK
UPASANI
Digitally signed by
Anant Chandrakant Chavan … Petitioner
SAYALI DEEPAK V/s.
UPASANI
Date: 2026.03.04
16:54:25 +0530 Grampanchayat Arathi thr. Gramsevak
and Others … Respondents
None for petitioner.
Mr. R. S. Pawar, AGP for State.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED : MARCH 04, 2026
P.C.:
1. The petition arises out of disqualification for election
conducted in the year 2009. Hence, due to the passage of time,
nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present writ petition.
2. The writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. No
costs.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
1
Checking your session…