Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MOHD. SIDDHIQ HAJI MOHD. SHAFI MOMINversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

A petition that is not pursued by the petitioner, evidenced by failure to appear and to circulate the petition, may be dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Mohd. Siddhiq Haji, failed to appear for the hearing and, after July 23, 2019, made no effort to circulate the writ petition. The court noted the petitioner's apparent lack of interest in pursuing the case. Consequently, the judges considered whether the petition could continue despite the petitioner's inaction. Relying on the principle that a petition must be actively pursued, the court held that the failure to appear and to take steps to move the petition amounts to non‑prosecution. The petition was therefore dismissed. No substantive merits of the underlying criminal matter were addressed.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear and does not take steps to advance the petition?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non-prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • petitioner's non-appearance

Judgment

                         sbw                                                   325-wp-2819-2018.doc




                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                          CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                            WRIT PETITION NO.2819 OF 2018

                    Mohd. Siddhiq Haji Mohd. Shafi Momin                        … Petitioner

                             V/s.

                    The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                             … Respondents




                    None for the Petitioner.
                    Mr. J. P. Yagnik, APP, for the Respondent-State.


                                                       CORAM :       A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                     KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                         DATE :      18th April 2026

                    P.C.:-

                    1)              None for Petitioner when called out for hearing.

                    2)              Record indicates that, after 23rd July, 2019, Petitioner and/or

                    his Advocate has not taken any steps to circulate the Petition, even for once.

                    2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

                    Petition.

                    3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                     (A.S. GADKARI, J.)


       Digitally
       signed by
       SANDHYA
                                                                                                      1/1
SANDHYA BHAGU
BHAGU   WADHWA
WADHWA Date:
       2026.04.23
       12:02:12
       +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.