Bombay High Court
HUMAID MOHAMMED HUMAID MOHAMMED SHATTAFversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear and pursue the relief.
Summary
The petitioners filed a writ petition on 3 May 2019 in the Bombay High Court. They failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to advance the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief sought. On this basis, the court held that the petition could not be kept pending. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear and take steps to pursue the case
Subjects
- writ petition
- non‑prosecution
- dismissal
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
- court procedure
Judgment
DTG 266-Wp.2848.2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2848 OF 2019
Humaid Mohammed Humaid
Mohammed Shattaf … Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
_______________________________________
None for Petitioner.
Mr. J.P. Yagnik, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
_______________________________________
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 17th June 2026
P.C. :
1) None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.
2) Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.
3rd May 2019, neither the Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any steps to
circulate the Petition, even once.
2.1) It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the
Petition.
3) Dismissed for non-prosecution.
( KAMAL KHATA, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
1/1
Checking your session…