Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MUKUNDA ANANDA JADHAV THR LEGAL HEIRSversusLATE MOHAMMAD HUSSAIN ISMAIL KAGADI THR LEGAL HEIRS AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition is disposed of as withdrawn unconditionally.

Summary

The petitioner, Mukunda Ananda Jadhav, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court and later sought to unconditionally withdraw it. Service of the petition had been effected on the respondents, who expressed no objection to the withdrawal. The court accepted the respondents' statement and allowed the petition to be withdrawn without any conditions. No order as to costs was made. The order was to be acted upon by all concerned on an authenticated copy.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can be withdrawn unconditionally after service on the respondents

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • procedure
  • High Court

Judgment

                                                                                         2-WP-2851-2025 (C).doc
           Digitally signed
           by PALLAVI
           MAHENDRA
PALLAVI    WARGAONKAR
MAHENDRA
WARGAONKAR Date:
           2026.05.15
           19:25:16
           +0530
                                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                  CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                  WRIT PETITION NO. 2851 OF 2025

                              Mukunda Ananda Jadhav Thr Legal Heirs               ...Petitioner
                                    Versus
                              Late Mohammad Hussain Ismail Kagadi
                              Thr Legal Heirs And Ors.                            ...Respondents
                                                        __________

                              Adv. Milan S. Raval h/f Aditya Desai, for the Petitioner/Applicant.
                              None for the Respondents.
                                                             __________

                                                        CORAM :      ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.

                                                        DATE     :   15 MAY 2026
                                                                     (VACATION COURT)

                              P.C.:

                              1.      Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner.

                              2.      The Petitioner seeks to unconditionally withdraw the Petition. He

                              states that service has been effected on the Respondents and the

                              Respondents have expressed their no objection to such withdrawal. Such

                              statement is accepted.

                              3.      The Petition is disposed of as withdrawn unconditionally. No order

                              as to costs.

                              4.      All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order.



                                                                     [ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.]




                  Pallavi                                                                             Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.