Bombay High Court
PRADEEP NANUBHAI PAGHDALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Pradeep Nanubhai Paghdal, failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the writ petition after April 15, 2019. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. No substantive merits of the petition were examined. The dismissal was entered by the judges Kamal Khata and A.S. Gadkari.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner shows no interest or fails to act?
Subjects
- writ petition
- non‑prosecution
- dismissal
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
- petitioner's inaction
Judgment
pmk 61-WP-2869-2018.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2869 OF 2018
Pradeep Nanubhai Paghdal … Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for the Respondent-State.
Ms. Ashiwini More, P.S.I., BKC Police Station, Present.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 12th June, 2026
P.C.:-
1) None for Petitioner, when called out for hearing.
2) Record indicates that, after 15th April, 2019, neither the
Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any steps to circulate the Petition,
even once.
2.1) It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the
Petition.
3) Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(KAMAL KHATA, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
1/1
Checking your session…