Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MANISHA ANADSAGAR UDGI AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition is dismissed as infructuous because the earlier order has fully resolved the matters raised.

Summary

The petitioners, Manisha Anadsagar Udgi and others, filed a criminal writ petition challenging an order. The petitioners' counsel submitted that the petition was rendered moot by a prior order of this Court in Criminal Writ Petition No. 6 of 2026 dated 02‑02‑2026, and produced a copy of that order. The Court examined whether the present petition retained any operative issue in view of the earlier judgment. Finding that the earlier order fully addressed the matters raised and left no remaining relief to be granted, the Court held that the petition had become infructuous. Consequently, the petition was disposed of without further hearing.

Issues considered

  • What is the effect of the earlier order in Criminal Writ Petition No. 6 of 2026 on the present writ petition?

Subjects

  • criminal writ petition
  • infructuous
  • petition dismissed
  • procedural bar
  • precedent

Judgment

                                                                                       926-WP-288-2022.doc




          Digitally signed
                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
          by HARISH
HARISH
VITHAL
          VITHAL
          CHAUDHARI
                                            CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CHAUDHARI Date:
          2026.08.04
          12:22:21 +0530
                                          CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                          CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 288 OF 2022

                     Manisha Anadsagar Udgi And Ors.                           ...Petitioners
                           Versus
                     State Of Maharashtra And Anr                              ...Respondents
                                                               …..
                     Mr. Darshan Singh Rajpurohit i/b Mr. Ritesh Thobde for the Petitioners.
                     Mr. Avinash A. Naik, APP for the Respondent No. 1-State.
                                                               …..

                                                       CORAM : SANDESH D. PATIL, J.
                                                       DATED : 31st JULY, 2026.
                     P. C. :

                     1.        Learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that the present Petition

                     does not survive in view of the order passed by this Court in Criminal Writ

                     Petition No. 6 of 2026 dated 02.02.2026. He tenders a copy of the said order,

                     which is taken on record.

                     2.        The Writ Petition is DISPOSED OF as having become infructuous.



                                                                         (SANDESH D. PATIL, J.)




                     Harish                                1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.