Bombay High Court
RAJENDRAKUMAR VISHWANATH TRIVEDIversusGOVT. OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Rajendrakumar Vishwanath Trivedi, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, neither he nor his counsel circulated the petition after May 2, 2019. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court held that the petition could not be entertained due to lack of prosecution. The petition was therefore dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when a petitioner fails to appear and does not prosecute a filed writ petition?
Subjects
- writ petition
- non‑prosecution
- dismissal
- high court
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
Judgment
DTG 73-wp290.2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 290 OF 2019
Rajendrakumar Vishwanath Trivedi … Petitioner
V/s.
Govt. Of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
_______________________________________
None for Petitioner.
Smt. P.P. Shinde, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
_______________________________________
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 17th June 2026
P.C. :
1) None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.
2) Record indicates that, after 2 nd May 2019, neither the Petitioner
nor his Advocate has taken any steps to circulate the Petition, even once.
2.1) It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the
Petition.
3) Dismissed for non-prosecution.
( KAMAL KHATA, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
1/1
Checking your session…