Bombay High Court
JAGDISH B. AHUJAversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER AND ANR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
- Bench
- NEELA KEDAR GOKHALE
Holding
The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Jagdish B. Ahuja filed a writ petition (No. 2921 of 2013) against the Municipal Corporation of Greater. No counsel appeared for the petitioner. A rule was issued on 4 February 2014, and an office report dated 6 February 2026 indicated that the amendment ordered on that date had not been carried out. The petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the case. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution.
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal for want of prosecution
- civil procedure
- non-appearance
Judgment
Navnath Waghmare
(P.A.) 71.wp 2921 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2921 OF 2013
Jagdish B. Ahuja …Petitioner
Versus
Municipal Corporation Of …Respondent
Greater And Anr.
None for the Petitioner.
Mr P. P. Chavan i/b Komal Punjabi, for the Respondent No.
1/ BMC.
Ms. Gauri S. Rao, APP for the Respondent No. 2-State
CORAM DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.
DATED: 12TH FEBRUARY 2026
PC:-
1. None appears for the Petitioner,
2. Rule was issued on 4th February, 2014. Office
report dated 06th February, 2026 indicates that as per order
dated 04th February, 2014 the amendment was not carried out.
Page 1 of 2
th
12 February 2026
Navnath Waghmare
(P.A.) 71.wp 2921 of 2013
3. It appears that the Petitioner is not interested in
pursuing the present Petition, hence the Petition is dismissed
for want of prosecution.
(DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J)
Page 2 of 2
th
12 February 2026
Checking your session…