Bombay High Court
Mehajabin Badshah NadafversusUnion Bank or India
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Mehajabin Badshah Nadaf, filed a writ petition challenging a notice issued under the SARFAESI Act and the subsequent seizure and auction of her property by Union Bank of India. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The petition, filed in 2025, was not pursued further by the petitioner, who expressed no interest in prosecuting the matter. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the petition for non‑prosecution. No substantive examination of the SARFAESI notice or the bank's actions was made. The dismissal was recorded by the bench of Justices Sharmila U. Deshmukh and Neeraj P. Dhote.
Legislation cited
Subjects
- SARFAESI Act
- notice challenge
- property seizure
- auction
- non‑prosecution
- writ petition
Judgment
2026:BHC-KOL:9321-DB
31-WP-2932-2025(C).doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2932 OF 2025
Mehajabin Badshah Nadaf ...Petitioner
Versus
Union Bank of India ...Respondent
——————
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. V. G. Badgujar, AGP for the Respondent-State.
——————
Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh &
Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ.
Date : September 28, 2026.
P. C. :
1. By the present Petition, the challenge is to the notice issued
under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and
Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (“SARFAESI Act”) and the
subsequent action taken under the notice including the seizure of the
property and auction.
2. None appears on behalf of the Petitioner.
3. The Petition is of the year 2025 and it appears that the
proceedings have been taken to its logical end and as such the
Petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the Petition. The Petition
stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
[Neeraj P. Dhote, J.] [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]
Jamadar - SL 1 of 1
Checking your session…